Latest:

Aug 24, 2016

Latest Leaks Reveal George Soros’ Plot to Manipulate Media

Originally appeared at Anti Media
In the two days since the Soros Open Society Foundation hack by the DCLeaks collective, several notable revelations have emerged among the data dump of over 2,500 documents exposing the internal strategy of the organization, which expose some of Soros’ tactics to influence and benefit from Europe’s refugee crisis, the opportunistic funding and influence of media organizations, providing cash for assorted “pro-democracy” groups including the infamous La Raza, Soros’ funding of various “social justice” organizations while paying to track unfavorable media coverage including that of Pamela Geller.
One particular leaked memo, profiled earlier by the Daily Caller, argues that Europe’s refugee crisis should be accepted as a “new normal,” and that the refugee crisis means “new opportunities” for Soros’ organization to influence immigration policies on a global scale. OSF program officer Anna Crowley and program specialist Katin Rosin co-authored the May 12 memo, titled “Migration Governance and Enforcement Portfolio Review.”
The nine-page review makes three key points: OSF has been successful at influencing global immigration policy; Europe’s refugee crisis presents “new opportunities” for the organization to influence global immigration policy; and the refugee crisis is the “new normal.”
As the authors write in the introduction, one of the purposes of the review “consider the effectiveness of the approaches we have used to achieve change at the international level.” A section of the review titled “Our Work” describes how America’s least transparent think tank has worked with “leaders in the field” to “shape migration policymaking and influence regional and global processes affecting the way migration is governed and enforced.”
This may be of particular interest to Germans, the majority of whom are displeased with Merkel’s “open door” policies in the aftermath of the recent terrorist attacks on German soil.
In a section titled, “Our Ambitions,” the authors explain: “Our premise for engaging in work related to governance was that, in addition to mitigating the negative effects of enforcement, we should also be supporting actors in the field proactively seeking to change the policies, rules, and regulations that govern migration.”
They write that “we also believed that advances at the regional or international levels could create impetus for policy change or implementation of existing norms at the national level. We deliberately avoided the term ‘global governance’ because there is no single system at the global level for managing migration.”
The same section later states that IMI “has had to be selective and opportunistic, particularly at the global level, in supporting leaders in the field to push thinking on migration and better coordinate advocacy and reform efforts. We have supported initiatives, organizations, and networks whose work ties directly to our aims in the corridors.”
“Early on, IMI identified a handful of organizations able to engage on migration globally and transnationally, elevating IMI’s corridor work beyond the national level,” reads another section of the memo, entitled “Our Place.”
“These included key think tanks such as the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) and advocacy networks such as the International Detention Coalition (IDC).” (The authors later note that MPI, a strong advocate of amnesty for illegal immigrants in America, “is sometimes criticized for its closeness to governments, [but] flexible funding from OSF has allowed it to maintain some independence from the governments it advises.”)
The memo also notes that “IMI played a central role in establishing and influencing the goals of two new [European Programme for Integration and Migration] sub-funds on the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) and immigration detention.
More importantly, the memo explains how Europe’s refugee crisis is opening doors for Soros’ organization to further influence global immigration policy.
The authors note that “the current refugee crisis is creating space to reconsider the governance of migration and the international refugee regime.” One reason for this is that the developing countries that make up the Group of 77 at the United Nations were motivated by the refugee crisis to keep immigration issues on the “global agenda,” the memo states. “The refugee crisis and the fear that the interests of migrants fleeing poverty, climate change, generalized violence, or natural disaster would be overlooked at these fora have generated a push from G77 countries to ensure other migration issues remain on the global agenda.”
They also explain that the current crisis provides “new opportunities” for influencing immigration policy on a global scale.
“The current climate presents new opportunities for reforming migration governance at the global level, whether through the existing multi-lateral system, or by bringing together a range of actors to think more innovatively. Our long-standing interest and investment in global work means we have many of the right partners and are positioned to help others navigate this space.”
The review states, “The refugee crisis is opening new opportunities” for “coordination and collaboration” with other wealthy donors.
It is almost as if Europe’s refugee crisis was planned and prepared, not just by the Soros organization, but others who would benefit from a shift in the change of regional “migration governance”, i.e., the reimposition of sovereignty terms, as Greece found out the hard way several months ago when its sovereignty was relegated to the country’s willingness to participate in Europe’s refugee scheme.
It will hardly come as a surprise that according to the review, immigration policy-makers need to accept the refugee crisis as a “new normal.” One of the conclusions listed in the memo is, “Accepting the current crisis as the new normal and moving beyond the need to react.”
“Observing our partners as they respond and adjust to the new reality in light of the crisis in Europe and the Mediterranean, we see little attention given to long-term planning or fundamentally new approaches to advocacy.”
The conclusion also stresses the need to fight back against “growing intolerance toward migrants.” It is unclear just how Soros plans on “fighting back.”
* * *
Needless to say, in order to promote its European refugee agenda, the Soros organization needs close European allies. Conveniently, it has a memo prepared just for that titled “Reliable allies in the European Parliament (2014 – 2019)” in which it notes the importance of building “lasting and trustworthy” relationships with European MEPs“likely to support Open Society’s work.”
This mapping provides the Open Society European Policy Institute and the Open Society network intelligence on Members of the 8th European Parliament likely to support Open Society values during the 2014–2019 legislature.
It spans 11 committees and 26 delegations, as well as the European Parliament’s highest decisionmaking bodies: 226 MEPs who are proven or likely Open Society allies.
The presence of an MEP in this mapping indicates that they are likely to support Open Society’s work. They should be approached with an open mind: although they will most likely want to work on areas they’re already interested in, they could also welcome hearing about new issues.
Beyond discussing individual topics, Open Society should seek to build lasting and trustworthy relationships with these European lawmakers.
Much more in the full 177 page memo.
* * *
Aside from Europe’s refugee crisis, the data leak provides other important glimpses in Soros’ influence of global affairs.

Aug 21, 2016

If you don’t believe in global warming, you’re too ‘mentally ill’ to be allowed to buy a gun, says Obama

(NaturalNews) In recent days, President Obama announced new “executive actions” on guns, that included language to shore up current federal law aimed at keeping mentally ill Americans from buying guns. Some skeptics of the president’s actions believe that, as is usually the case, there are ulterior motives behind his actions.
For example, some believe that the president’s order may include guidance on declaring people who disagree with Obama’s policies – like those regarding so-called “global warming” and “climate change” – as mentally unstable.
It’s not too far out of the realm of possibility, given this president’s narcissism, anti-gun demeanor and ideological, cult-like adherence to the concept of man-caused climate phenomena.
As noted by the Media Research Center, anyone designated as “mentally ill” by doctors – who now have been empowered to report patients they deem to be unfit to the FBI – can be denied the right to keep and bear arms.
The official White House fact sheet on Obama’s new regulations states:
“Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS.” [Emphasis added]

‘Climate denial’ is a ‘mental disorder’

Obama has repeatedly claimed that the threat of climate change is a greater one than that of terrorism; so, aren’t people who deny that climate change is real, a danger to themselves or others and, thus, unfit to own firearms?
The notion that climate skeptics are not mentally capable people is not a new concept employed by the radical Left. Consider:
— Oregon-based “sociology and environmental studies” Prof. Kari Norgaard has publicly stated that skepticism of climate change is a mental problem that must be “treated.” (To show what a fruit loop this woman is, she also compared acceptance of the reality that climate change is bogus, to the “struggle” against racism and slavery.)
— The journal Psychology Today published an article that listed a trio of warning signs that you are living a life of “climate change denial:”
You think climate change is bad, but not that bad.
You don’t have an emotional reaction to climate change.
You aren’t getting political.
So, if you’re one of those people who have come to understand that the climate change agenda is really about control, not “saving the planet,” or you’re not mad enough about it, or you’ve opted out of the political fight over it, you’re mental.
— As noted by The Telegraph‘s Christopher Booker (one of those mentally ill deniers), in apiece entitled,Climate ‘denial’ is now a mental disorder, says so-called “eco-psychologists” convened recently at the University of the West of England in Bristol, to examine the notion of classifying climate change denial as a “mental disorder.”
— And who could forget that Obama’s EPA chief, Gina McCarthy, said that deniers are not “normal” people?

Believe it – or else

Those crazy Leftists – they create their own narrative and then, when the majority of people catch onto them, they change the rules of the game back into their favor.
Can’t convince people to believe in the man-caused global warming hoax on their own? Fine – we’ll just label them crazy, and for extra measure, we’ll see to it that they are denied their constitutional rights in the process.
Speaking of bat-stuffing crazy regarding this issue, how about Robert Kennedy, Jr., calling for a law that punishes people who don’t buy the warming globaloney? That’s no different than a dictator requiring his people to believe in his edicts, no matter how obviously flawed they are, or risk losing their freedom (or lives).
It’s not clear that Obama’s order will affect global warming – let’s call them realists – but you can certainly see where this “you’re crazy if you don’t believe it” attitude could go.

Aug 19, 2016

Jews and Bolshevism: Names and Lists

From heretical.com

Amongst themselves, the Jews are quite candid about their sympathy for and involvement in Bolshevism.

On 4 April 1919 the Jewish Chronicle: “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.”
(Perhaps this explains why the Red Army uses a Jewish star as its symbol?)

Probably the best-known exposé of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik coup d’état was by Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald of 8 February 1920. Churchill wrote “With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and the driving power comes from Jewish leaders.”

Communism was of course founded by Karl Marx whose grandfather was a rabbi by the name of MordeccaiMarx was given his initial encouragement by a Communist-Zionist by the name of Moses Hess. As founder and editor of theRheinische Zeitung, the main organ of leftist thought in Germany, he provided Karl Marx with his first important platform. Later, in Brussels, he collaborated with Marx on The German Ideology. It was Hess too who converted to Communism Friedrich Engels, the wealthy textiles magnate who later subsidised Marx from the profits of sweated labour in Britain and Germany.

When the Bolsheviks overthrew the short-lived democratic government in Moscow and St. Petersburg in October 1917, it was a virtual Jewish coup d’état. The most prominent Jewish Commissar was Trotsky, real name Bronstein. He had been married by a rabbi in 1900, and whilst in exile in New York he had worked for Novy Mir, described in the Church Times (23 January 1925) as a “Yiddish newspaper.”

The various reporters and diplomats who were there at the time of the “Revolution” have given evidence as to its Jewish nature.
The widow of the Guardian’s correspondent Mrs. Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams wrote: “In the Soviet Republic all the committees and commissaries were filled with Jews.”

The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the Bolshevik ‘revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of The Times. In 1920 he published a book in French, Les Derniers Jours des Romanofs, which gave the racial background of all the members of the Soviet government. (This does not appear in the later English translation, for some odd reason.) After the publication of this monumental work, Wilton was ostracised by the press, and he died in poverty in 1925. He reported that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:

NAMENATIONALITY
Bronstein (Trotsky)Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief)Jew
Lourie (Larine)Jew
OuritskiJew
VolodarskiJew
Rosenfeldt (Kamanef)Jew
SmidovitchJew
Sverdlof (Yankel)Jew
Nakhamkes (Steklof)Jew
Ulyanov (Lenin)Russian
KrylenkoRussian
LounatcharskiRussian

“The Council of the People’s Commissars comprises the following:

MINISTRYNAMENATIONALITY
PresidentUlyanov (Lenin)Russian
Foreign AffairsTchitcherineRussian
NationalitiesDjugashvili (Stalin)Georgian
AgricultureProtianArmenian
Economic CouncilLourie (Larine)Jew
FoodSchlichterJew
Army & NavyBronstein (Trotsky)Jew
State ControlLanderJew
State LandsKauffmanJew
WorksV. SchmidtJew
Social ReliefE. Lelina (Knigissen)Jewess
Public InstructionLounatcharskyRussian
ReligionsSpitzbergJew
InteriorApfelbaum (Zinovief)Jew
HygieneAnveltJew
FinanceIsidore GoukovskiJew
PressVolodarskiJew
ElectionsOuritskiJew
JusticeI. SteinbergJew
RefugeesFenigsteinJew
Refugees (assist.)SavitchJew
Refugees (assist.)ZaslovskiJew

“The following is the list of members of the Central Executive Committee:

NAMENATIONALITY
Sverdlov (president)Jew
Avanessof (sec.)Armenian
BrunoLett
BabtchinskiJew
BukharinRussian
WeinbergJew
GailissJew
GanzburgJew
DanichevskiJew
StarckGerman
SachsJew
ScheinmannJew
ErdlingJew
LandauerJew
LinderJew
WolachCzech
DimansteinJew
EncukidzeGeorgian
ErmannJew
JoffeJew
KarklineJew
KnigissenJew
Rosenfeldt (Kamenef)Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief)Jew
KrylenkoRussian
KrassikofSachsJew
KaprikJew
KaoulLett
Ulyanov (lenin)Russian
LatsisJew
LanderJew
LounatcharskiRussian
PetersonLett
PetersLett
RoudzoutasJew
RosineJew
SmidovitchJew
StoutchkaLett
Nakhamkes (Steklof)Jew
SosnovskiJew
SkrytnikJew
Bronstein (Trotsky)Jew
TeodorovitchJew
TerianArmenian
OuritskiJew
TelechkineRussian
FeldmannJew
FroumkineJew
SouriupaUkranian
TchavtchevadzeGeorgian
ScheikmannJew
RosentalJew
AchkinaziImeretian
KarakhaneKaraim (Jew)
RoseJew
Sobelson (Radek)Jew
SclichterJew
SchikoliniJew
ChklianskiJew
Levine (Pravdine)Jew

“The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission of Moscow:

NAMENATIONALITY
Dzerjinski (president)Pole
Peters (vice-president)Lett
ChklovskiJew
KheifissJew
ZeistineJew
RazmirovitchJew
KronbergJew
KhaikinaJewess
KarlsonLett
SchaumannJew
LeontovitchJew
Jacob GoldineJew
GlapersteinJew
KniggisenJew
LatzisLett
SchillenkussJew
JansonLett
RivkineJew
AntonofRussian
DelafabreJew
TsitkineJew
RoskirovitchJew
G. SverdlofJew
BiesenskiJew
BlioumkineJew
AlexandrevitchRussian
I. ModelJew
RoutenbergJew
PinesJew
SachsJew
DaybolLett
SaissouneArmenian
DeylkenenLett
LiebertJew
VogelGerman
ZakissLett

Although Lenin is described as a “Russian,” in fact he was a mixture of various nationalities. It is likely that he was one-quarter Russian, one-quarter German, one-quarter Jewish and at least one-quarter Kalmuck (Mongol), which accounts for his Mongol appearance. Various authorities allege that his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya was a Jewess and that her family spoke Yiddish in the home.

A report sent to the British government in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke, the Dutch consul in St. Petersburg, said that “Bolshevism is organised and worked by Jews.” The report was included in a pamphlet published as a government White Paper in April 1919 entitled Russia No. 1 (1919) A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. However, the pamphlet was quickly withdrawn and reissued with various excisions and alterations made.

Chart: Clinton Foundation Donations Linked to State Department Favors

From Patriotrising, 08/18/2016

Coordination between Clinton Foundation and State Dept. revealed


The recent release of additional private emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email servers based at her New York home provide a clearer picture of the “pay-to-play” connections between Clinton’s State Department, her and her husband’s and daughter’s Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative, and the private investment consulting and investment firm of Teneo Holdings, Inc. in Manhattan.
DonorAmount given to Clinton Foundation/Global Initiative (CGI)Received in return
Prince of Abu Dhabi and Foreign Minister of the United Arab Emirates Shaikh Abdullah bin Zayed al Nahayan and the Al Nahayan family of Abu Dhabi <$5,000,000Access to HRC at State Dept. and a $500,000 environmental speech by Bill Clinton given at the Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi while HRC was meeting in Washington with Shaikh Abdullah.
Algeria $500,000State clearance for U.S. arms sales to Algeria. Deal included biological and chemical agents.
Australia, Commonwealth of $75,000,000Strong State Dept. for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which stands to be a boon for Australian multinational firms.
Bahrain, Kingdom of $250,000Muted criticism by State of Bahrain’s abysmal human rights practices.
Boeing Corp. $900,000State Dept. clearance for $29 billion arms U.S. arms sale to Saudi Arabia, including Boeing’s F-15 fighter.
Brunei Darussalam, Sultanate of $5,000,000State Dept. clearance for U.S. weapons sales to Brunei.
Cameroon, Republic of <$100,000Influence buying by the Cameroon government with the Clinton State Department.
Canada $500,000State Dept. support for Canada’s Keystone XL pipeline, eventually vetoed by Barack Obama.
Chagoury Group<$5,000,000 in cash and a $1,000,000,000 pledgeHRC delayed designating Nigeria’s Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist organization because of Chagoury Group’s investments and operations in Nigeria. Chagoury Group received the “Sustainable Development Award” from the CGI. Chagooury helped the family of Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha hide his wealth stolen from Nigeria’s oil revenues.
Confederation of Indian Industry <$1,000,000Access for Indian businesses to U.S. government officials.
Corning, Inc. $150,000Clinton arranged for international access for the New York-based firm.
Dahdaleh, Victor <$5,000,000Lobbyist for Bahrain state-owned aluminum company who sought a contract between the Bahraini firm and the U.S.-owned Alcoa World Alumina.
Dominican Republic <$25,000,000Clinton Foundation board member Rolando Gonzalez’s company InterEnergy received contracts from Dominican government for wind energy projects. The firm received Domican President’s Gold Citizen Award in 2010.
Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) <$100,000State pressure on Justice Dept. to curtail criminal investigation of FIFA.
Fernwood Foundation (Canadian foundation run by Canadian uranium mining mogul Ian Telfer $2,600,000Telfer’s UrAsia and Uranium One Corporations, co-owned with Canadian mining magnate and “Friend of Bill” Frank Giustra receved favorable uranium mining deals with Kazakhstan and Russia’s ROSATOM and Kazakhstan’s KAZATOMPROM.
Flanders, Government of €780,000 ($872,000)High-level access to U.S. government officials by Flemish government officials and businesses.
GEMS Education, Dubai $5,600,000Bill Clinton made “honorary chairman” of the Dubai company.
Germany, Federal Republic of $250,000High-level access to U.S. government officials by German officials and businessmen.
Giustra, Frank (Canadian mining magnate) (Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership/Radcliffe Foundation) $31,300,000State soft-peddled threat of the Islamic State because Lafarge had negotiated with the terrorists to maintain its operations in ISIL-controlled territory in Syria. arranged favorable deals with Kazakhstan and its president, Nursultan Nazarbayev.
Hindustan Construction Corp. (India) <$500,000Access for corporate officials to U.S. government officials.
Ireland, Republic of <$158,300,000Influence-buying by Irish government with the Clintons.
Italy, Republic of $100,000Influence buying by the Italian government with the Clinton State Department.
Jamaica$100,000Digicel Group, owned by Irish billionaire and Friend of Bill, Denis O’Brien, received USAID grant for a telecommunications project in Jamaica. Digicel (Jamaica) paid Bill Clinton $225,000 for a speech in Kingston. That was in addition to the $100,000 kicked in by Jamaica to the Clinton Foundation.
Kuwait, Emirate of $10,000,000State Dept. clearance for U.S. weapons sales to Kuwait.
Lafarge Group<$100,000State soft-peddled threat of Islamic State (ISIL) in Syria because Lafarge had an agreement with ISIL not to interfere in Lafarge activities in ISIL-controlled territory in Syria. HRC was a director of Lafarge between 1990 and 1992, at a time when the firm was selling strategic military materials to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
Lesotho, Kingdom of <$100,000Kickback from $11.2 million Irish grant to Clinton Foundation for HIV/AIDS abatement in Lesotho.
Mittal, Lakshmi, owner of ArcelorMittal, a major steel company, and board member of Goldman Sachs <$5,000,000Favorable opportunities in Kazakhstan, where Mittal is a member of the Foreign Investment Council of Kazakhstan. Dovetails with Bill Clinton’s uranium deals with Giustra and Nazarbayev.
Sheikh Mohammed H. Al Amoudi (Ethiopian-Saudi billionaire)1 <$10,000,000Influence-buying within the Clinton State Dept.
Monsanto <$5,000,000State advocated for Monsanto “Frankenfood” and “Frankenseeds” worldwide.
Netherlands, Kingdom of the (Netherlands National Lottery) $10,000,000State helped open up investment opportunities for Dutch firms in Africa.
New Zealand, Government of $1,200,000Influence-buying within the Clinton State Dept.
Norway, Kingdom of $89,600,000Norwegian government split up donations to make them look smaller than they actually were. Norwegian firms received investment opportunities in the developing world, courtesy of the U.S. Millennium Goals Corporation.
Oman, Sultanate of <$5,000,000State clearance for U.S. weapons sales to Oman.
Papua New Guinea, Government of <$100,000Influence-buying within the Clinton State Dept.
Qatar, Emirate of <$5,000,000State Dept. approval for U.S. arms sales to Qatar. State pressure on Justice Dept. to curtail investigation of bribery payments regarding FIFA and 2022 World Cup host, Qatar.
Ras al Khaimah, Emirate of $50,000Influence-buying within the Clinton State Dept.
Rwanda, Republic of $200,000Influence-buying with HRC’s State Department.
Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of $25,000,000State Dept. approval for U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia
Suzlon Energy, Ltd. (Amsterdam) <$5,000,000State and CGI promoted wind turbine solutions in developing countries. Suzlon, owned by an Indian national, is a leading supplier of wind turbines.
Swaziland, Kingdom of <$100,000Access to U.S. government officials for Swazi government/private business leaders.
Sweden, Kingdom of $7,200,000Access to U.S. government officials for Swedish government/private business leaders.
Switzerland, Confederation of $325,000Access to U.S. government officials for Swiss government/private business leaders.
Tenerife Island, Government of $50,000High-level access to U.S. government officials by Flemish government officials and businesses.
Taiwan $10,000,000State Dept. approval for U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan.
United Arab Emirates <$5,000,000State Dept. approval for U.S. weapons sales to the UAE.
United Kingdom £50,000,000 ($78,000,000)Access for key UK officials and UK businesses to key U.S.government policymakers.
Victor Pinchuk Foundation (Ukraine) $8,600,000Buy influence with Clinton at State to pressure Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych to free jailed former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.
Walmart, Inc. <$5,000,000HRC pressured Indian government to open up India to Walmart, an action opposed by India’s small retailers.
In addition to these entities, there are separate Clinton family foundations that maintain their own revenue streams: the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton (BHCC) Foundation, the Clinton Foundation Hong Kong, William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (Kenya), William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (UK), and the Clinton Foundation Insalingsstiftelse (Sweden). All these entities maintain separate operations for the Clintons’ pay-to-play global racketeering operations.

Wayne Madsen is an investigative journalist who consistently exposes cover-ups from deep within government. Want to be the first to learn the latest scandal? Click on the banner above and subscribe today!
The Clinton operations are massive in relation to the reported lobbying dealings that Donald Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, maintained with the former Yanukovych government of Ukraine. The sudden appearance of “secret ledgers” containing Manafort’s name and alleged cash payments to him by the puppet Ukrainian government of George Soros bear all the signs of another Soros/Cass Sunstein disinformation operation.